Holoprism

Follow anything that matters.

Tell Holoprism what you want to follow: a regulation, a market, a technology, a region, a risk. It proposes the sources worth watching, checks every one, watches them for you and tells you what changed, with every item traced to where it came from.

An area in Holoprism: Sanctions and Export Controls, with this week's items, the signals it watches for and the weekly digest to sign

An area set up on 21 September 2026: 10 sources, 258 items collected, 32 about sanctions and export controls. Real sources, real items.

How it works

From a few words to an area you follow

Five steps. The guide does the research a careful analyst would do; Holoprism checks every claim it makes about a source; you decide what is kept.

1

Name the area

A few words, in any language. Start from an example or from whatever you are responsible for knowing about.

Holoprism asking: What do you want to follow?
2

The guide drafts it

One model call returns what the area covers and leaves out, the terms that mark a headline as belonging to it, the signals worth watching for, questions to keep score on, and the decisions it could inform. You edit any of it.

  • EU AI Act, drafted and checked42 s
  • Model calls in the whole setup1–2
The scope step: name, summary, the terms that define the area, what it includes and leaves out
3

Every source is checked

The guide proposes sources; code fetches each one. Dead links and bot walls are dropped, a page that hides a feed is swapped for the feed, and every source shows how much of what it publishes is actually about the area. Ask the guide for replacements when some fail.

  • Proposed for the EU AI Act19
  • Answered and watchable10
  • Feeds found by looking4
  • Checked in, without a model7 s
The sources step: feeds, pages and sources that did not answer, each with what the check found
4

You choose what to watch for

Each signal is a short list of word stems, tested on every item that belongs to the area. Keep the ones that matter, add your own, and switch off the rest.

The watch-for step: signals with keyword stems, and questions to keep score on
5

Holoprism watches

Feeds are read every hour, pages every six. An unchanged source costs nothing, and no model runs after setup. The weekly digest says what came in, what matched, and which sources went quiet, and it goes nowhere until a named person signs it.

  • Model calls after setup0
  • Silent feeds it caught in the sanctions area3
  • Quietest: UN Security Council committeessince Oct 2023
The area's dashboard
The weekly digest on paper, waiting for a typed signature

Why trust it

The model proposes. Code checks.

No source is taken on trust

Every URL the guide suggests is fetched before you see it. What does not answer is shown as not answering, never quietly kept.

9 of 19 proposals dropped for the EU AI Act

Diff before you think

Nothing expensive runs until a cheap check confirms something changed. Watching costs almost nothing, so you can watch a lot.

0 model calls after setup

Every item traced

Each item keeps its source URL, the time it was read and a hash of the snapshot it came from. Click any line down to the evidence.

item → observation → raw snapshot

Watched once, shared

A source someone else already follows is shared, not fetched twice. Each new area makes the next one cheaper to set up.

10 of 10 sources reused by a second area

Silence is reported

A feed that stops publishing, or a source that stops answering, shows up in the digest. What you cannot see is part of the picture.

“published nothing since 24 Oct 2023”

Nothing leaves without a name

A digest or a channel item goes out only after a named person signs it, or a policy they signed. The signature and a hash go to an append-only ledger.

typed name → evidence ledger

Any area

If it is published somewhere, it can be followed

Holoprism is organised by the shape of what it reads, feeds, pages, registers, APIs, not by topic. That is why one setup flow is built to work across a hundred different fields.

Government & law

  • National AI legislation
  • Sanctions and export controls
  • Public procurement tenders
  • Central bank decisions

Health

  • Disease outbreaks
  • Drug approvals
  • Medical-device recalls
  • Antimicrobial resistance

Technology & standards

  • Security vulnerabilities
  • AI model releases
  • Platform policy changes
  • Semiconductor fabs

Environment & climate

  • Renewable-energy pipelines
  • Climate litigation
  • Carbon-credit registries
  • Drought and water

Economy & markets

  • Funding rounds
  • Commodity prices and trade
  • Layoffs and hiring
  • IPOs and M&A

Science & research

  • Preprints by topic
  • Clinical trial registries
  • Retractions
  • Research funding awards

Funding & opportunities

  • Research fellowships
  • Climate-tech grants
  • Innovation grants
  • Open-source funds

Organisations

  • Think tanks on AI policy
  • Standards bodies
  • Development-bank projects
  • Humanitarian operations

Security & risk

  • Cyber incidents
  • Armed conflict
  • Maritime security
  • Disinformation campaigns

Culture & society

  • Census releases
  • Media ownership
  • Curriculum changes
  • Conference calendars

Forty of the hundred use cases Holoprism was designed against, in ten fields.

Channels

Follow it. Then publish it.

An area you follow can become a channel: a feed under your own name, where every item is one click from its source and a named editor decides what goes out.

Area

What you follow

Sources, the terms that define it and the signals to watch for. Harvested, diff-first, with provenance on every item.

EU AI Act implementation

Dashboard

What you read

What came in, what matched, what went quiet, and a weekly digest you sign.

This week’s digest, signed

Channel

What you publish

Your brand and your editorial standards on top; Holoprism’s verification underneath. Readers click any fact to its source.

Dobré zprávy on bohemie.org

Where it started

Bohemie decided what matters. Holoprism found out what is happening.

Bohemie is a Czech civic platform with its own view of what matters: 12 areas and 50 metrics. It had no machine to see what was actually happening. Holoprism became that machine. It harvests first-hand sources, keeps the evidence behind every story and tags it to Bohemie’s areas; Bohemie’s editors decide what is worth publishing. The good-news channel Dobré zprávy is the result, and it is the pattern every publisher on Holoprism follows.

Stories published on bohemie.org at launch, 21 Sep 202672
Harvest runs a day, on AWS in the EU4
Public feeds for any readerRSS · Atom · JSON
Who lets a story outa named editor
Who decides what is provableHoloprism
Who decides what is worth publishingthe publisher

Running now

Already watching real sources

Live

Dobré zprávy

bohemie.org · good news, verified

Stories are harvested from first-hand sources, kept with the evidence behind every fact, and published under Bohemie’s brand under an editor’s signed policy.

  • Stories at launch72
  • Harvest runs a day4
Harvested

Bohemie Index

World Bank · WHO · Our World in Data

Czechia’s national metrics with a source, a retrieval time and a hash on every figure, and cross-checked wherever two sources exist.

  • Metrics measured13 of 50
  • Corruption sources disagree10 of 13 yrs
Watching

API and platform policy

model-provider release feeds

Release feeds of the major AI providers’ SDKs and tools, watched hourly, so a platform change arrives as a dated, sourced line.

  • Feeds watched5
  • Releases in the last week21

What do you want to follow?

Holoprism is in early access. Open the platform, type the area you are responsible for knowing about, and it sets itself up. Logins are issued by the team.

Open the platformearly access · login required